IR_L Division
| FCI | Quality Plan | Doc.No.:IRLab/QP/01 | |||||
|
|
Issue No.:0 | ||||||
| Title : Procedure for processing & monitoring of court cases. | Page: 1of 1 | ||||||
| Page Rev.No:.00 | |||||||
| Approved By: | Effective Date: | ||||||
| Process/ Stage. | Parameter | Acceptance criteria | Ref. Doc. | ||||
| 2. | Identification of Petitioner. | The petitioner is identified whether he is genuine employee of FCI or not. | Respective case file. | ||||
| Respondant. | The respondants are identified. | ||||||
| Nature of Grievance. | The cause of the grievance are identified and genuineness of the grievance is examined. | ||||||
| Verification | The petition is verified to ascertain the bonafideness & genuineness of Documents.. | ||||||
| 3 | Completeness | It must contain all the required documents / evidences mentioned in the petition. | Respective case file. | ||||
| 7 | Empanelment. | The Advocate should be empanelled by Legal Division. If required Senior Advocate should be engaged on special fee with the approval of Competent authority.. | Respective case file. | ||||
| Time | The case shall be processed timely to meet the court directives. | ||||||
| 9. | Proceeding of Court. | The proceeding of the court are attended & maintained. | Respective case file. | ||||
| 10. | Additional documents. | All the additional documents/evidences required by Court would be collected from the field. | Respective case file. | ||||
| 12 | Repurcussion & liabilities. | The repurcussion of the verdict are examined including the liabilities of the FCI. It is decided to accept the verdict or challenge the verdict in higher Court. | Respective case file. | ||||
| Genuine / justification. | The justification of the decision is analysed. | ||||||
| Time | Time should be adhered to, if specified. | ||||||
| 13. | Completeness | The decision being communicated should be completed and legible. | Respective Case file. | ||||
| FCI | Quality Plan | ||||||
|
|
Issue No.:01 | ||||||
| Title : Process Flow Chart for processing of demands/issues relating to service condition of labour. | |||||||
| Page Rev.No.00 | |||||||
| Approved By: | Effective Date: | ||||||
| Process/ Stage. | Parameter | Acceptance criteria | Ref. Doc. | ||||
| 2. | Evaluation of Demands. | ( I ) The demand received should be related to the service conditions of the manual labour. | Existing policies / Guideline / Mannual. | ||||
| ( ii ) The demands raised should be justified | Examination of proposal in concerned policy file. | ||||||
| ( iii ) The analysis of demand should be reveal either change in existing procedure, change in policy or solving of implementation problem. | |||||||
| Time | The demands received should be analysed within a weeks time or as per the requirement of Management. | ||||||
| 4 & 7A | Evaluation by discussion. | The concerned union is called for discussion to evaluate its repercussions of issues raised from financial and legal aspects. | - do - | ||||
| 7B | Contents. | The proposal shall include the following : - (I) Justification of demands. (ii) Implication (financial & legal). (iii) Authority to approve the proposal. The CA to review the proposal for its justification and implication before approving it. | Concerned file. | ||||
| 10. | Review | ||||||
| 8(B) | Contents and structure. | The revised procedure should be in line with the consensus emerged during discussions with labour union (in case discussions are held with them ) and it should be within the policy of GOI / FCI. | Concerned policy file. | ||||
| The revised procedure should be comprehensive & understandable to field offices for its monitoring and implementation. | |||||||
| 11. | Sign. | The issues relating to change in policy / procedure on which consenses emerged during discussions & approved by competent authority are settled by signing bilateral / tripartite settlement (if necessary ). | Concerned policy file. | ||||